Inter partes review, PGR and post-grant practice.
150 articles · page 7 of 13
CASE OF THE WEEK Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Appeal Nos. 2024-1965, -1966, -2082, -2083 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 29, 2025) Our Case of the Week is a 31-page decision that touches on a variety of issues, including personal…
Written by : Arash Pia & Daniel Kiang APPLE INC. v. GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC. Before Lourie, Dyk , and Hughes. Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Summary : The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has jurisdiction over IPRs…
Written by : Brianne M. Kingery and Daniel P. Hughes LYNK LABS, INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. Before Lourie, Prost , and Stark Summary: In an IPR, a patent application is considered a “printed publication” as of the application’s…
At the heart of the patent disputes that define industries and drive innovation lies a little-understood group of decision-makers: PTAB Judges, or Administrative Patent Judges (APJs). Tasked with resolving complex patent challenges, these experts at the…
In the high-stakes world of patent law, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) serves as a battleground for innovation and competition. Success in PTAB proceedings demands more than legal expertise—it requires strategic foresight. For attorneys,…
Written by : Kenneth O. Aruda, Ph.D. & J ason J. Jardine In the ongoing case of Carefirst of Maryland Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson [1] , the plaintiffs successfully overcame a motion to dismiss. At the heart of the case is J&J’s legal strategy against…
CASE OF THE WEEK Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Ericsson AB, Ericsson, Inc. v. Lenovo (United States), Inc. et. al. , Appeal No. 2024-1515 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 24, 2024) In our Case of the Week, the Federal Circuit clarified that, for an issue in a domestic…
Intellectual property litigation is becoming increasingly competitive, with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) serving as a critical venue for resolving patent disputes. As patent owners and petitioners continue to rely on PTAB proceedings to either…
CASE OF THE WEEK AlexSam, Inc. v. Aetna, Inc. , Appeal No. 2022-2036 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 8, 2024) In the Court’s only precedential patent opinion last week, a panel of the Federal Circuit granted appellant AlexSam a second chance to hold health-care…
Recently launched, Patexia’s 2024 PTAB Intelligence Report provides a detailed analysis of the latest trends and developments in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). It provides a clear overview of performance across the board, helping…
CASE OF THE WEEK Crocs, Inc. v. Double Diamond Distribution, Ltd. , Appeal No. 2022-2160 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 3, 2024) In our Case of the Week, the Federal Circuit examined whether a district court erred in dismissing false advertising claims against Crocs Inc.…
Patexia has recently launched its 2024 PTAB Intelligence Report , offering a detailed analysis of the latest trends and developments in Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) proceedings. As the intellectual property landscape evolves, PTAB continues to play…
