No URLs, No Liability: Court Finds Online Marketplace Not Liable for Contributory Infringement
Contributed by Knobbe Martens. Originally published on Patexia; republished here as part of the LexDana archive.
Written by: Gregory B. Phillips and Priyanka Menon
Microtech Knives, Inc. v. Outdoors Online, LLC et al., 1:23-cv-04381-VMC (N.D. Ga. Sep. 25, 2025)
Before: The Honorable Victoria Marie Calvert
Summary: The district court granted summary judgment to defendant, an online marketplace accused of contributory trademark infringement, because of the plaintiff’s failure to provide specific notice of infringement.
Defendant GunBroker.com is an online marketplace for firearms and knives with millions of third-party listings. It has an anti-counterfeiting and takedown policy that bans infringing goods and permits the removal of counterfeit listings. In 2023, Plaintiff Microtech Knives, Inc., sent a cease-and-desist letter to Gunbroker.com demanding the removal of advertisements by others for replicas of Microtech knives from Gunbroker.com’s online marketplace. Although the letter alleged unauthorized use of seventeen registered trademarks on knives advertised on the site, Microtech did not provide URLs, item numbers, merchant names, or seller IDs. When GunBroker’s outside counsel requested these details, none were provided. Nonetheless, GunBroker enforced its policy and removed 21 listings that it found and believed violated its policy.
When moving for summary judgment, GunBroker.com argued that it could not be held contributorily liable because Microtech failed to provide necessary details of infringing listings, such as URLs, item numbers, merchant names, or seller IDs, to establish knowledge. Without these specifics, GunBroker lacked the knowledge required for contributory liability, even though it quickly removed suspect listings despite insufficient notice. Additionally, the court noted that generalized evidence of widespread infringement is not enough to establish actual or constructive knowledge. Accordingly, the court granted summary judgment in GunBroker’s favor.
More insights
The Prosecution Data Most IP Attorneys Never Look At
Most prosecution strategy is set before anyone looks at who is actually examining the application. What is sitting there unused Every examiner has a history: allowance rate, average number of office actions, how often an interview changes the outcome. None…
Federal Circuit Affirms Invalidation of Patent for Lack of Enablement of Claims Directed to a Method of Treating a Patient with a Unit Dosage in Wyeth Llc v Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals Lp
Written by : Eric Furman, Ph.D. and Ashley C. Morales Key Takeaway: Federal Circuit invalidates patent claims directed to a method for treating non-small cell lung cancer through administration of “a unit dosage” of an irreversible epidermal…
When About Becomes Indefinite Federal Circuit Provides Guidance for Life Science Patent Applications Regarding Limits of Approximation in Enviro Tech v Safe Foods
Written by : Jason J. Jardine and Kenneth O. Aruda, Ph.D. Key Takeaway: The term “about” remains useful in biotech and pharmaceutical claims, but only if the patent provides objective guidance about what the term means. Absent that guidance,…