Appeals, precedential opinions and what they change downstream.
179 articles · page 8 of 15
CROWN PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. BELVAC PRODUCTION MACHINERY, INC. Before Dyk , Hughes, and Cunningham. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. Summary : An offer for sale described as a…
Written by : Ashley C. Morales and Brandon G. Smith PS PRODUCTS INC. V. PANTHER TRADING CO. INC. Before Moore , Stoll, and Cunningham. Appeal from the Eastern District of Arkansas. Summary : Section 285 does not prohibit an award of deterrence sanctions…
Written by : Brian C. Barnes and Brandon G. Smith DDR HOLDINGS, LLC V. PRICELINE.COM LLC, BOOKING.COM B.V. Before Chen , Mayer, and Cunningham. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Delaware. Summary : Deleting a…
CASE OF THE WEEK Mirror Worlds Technologies, LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc. , Appeal Nos. 2022-1600, -1709 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 4, 2024) In this appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, the Federal Circuit affirmed the…
The 2024 CAFC Intelligence Report was released at the beginning of November, offering a comprehensive look into the dynamic world of appellate IP litigation. This in-depth report analyzes trends, rankings, and statistics from the U.S. Court of Appeals for…
CASE OF THE WEEK Cisco Systems, Inc. et al. v. K.Mizra LLC , Appeal Nos. 2022-2290, 2023-1183 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 19, 2024) In the Federal Circuit’s only precedential action this week, a panel of the Court declined to dismiss an appeal after the parties…
Written by : Brandon G. Smith & Zachary B. Grinovich TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON v. LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC. Before Lourie, Prost, and Reyna. Appeal from the Eastern District of North Carolina. Summary: The threshold requirement for anti-suit…
Written by : Douglas B. Wentzel & H enry P. FitzGerald UTTO INC. v. METROTECH CORP. Before Prost, Taranto , and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Summary: The district court erred in construing…
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) continues to shape the intellectual property landscape, resolving disputes that set industry benchmarks and drive innovation. The 2024 CAFC Intelligence Report showcases the top-performing and most…
The intellectual property landscape constantly evolves, with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) serving as a central forum in shaping patent law. Tomorrow, Patexia will release the 2024 CAFC Intelligence Report , a comprehensive tool…
Written by : Nickolas Taylor & Daniel Kiang ALEXSAM, INC. v. ATENA, INC. Before Stark , Lourie, and Bryson. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. Summary : A narrowly defined patent license may result in some…
Written by : Nathan D. Reeves & Ryan B. Freedman CROCS, INC. v. EFFERVESCENT, INC. Before Reyna, Cunningham and Albright. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. Summary: A claim that an unpatented product feature is…
